Locally Private Bayesian Inference for Count Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a general method for privacy-preserving Bayesian inference in Poisson factorization, a broad class of models that includes some of the most widely used models in the social sciences. Our method satisfies limited precision local privacy, a generalization of local differential privacy, which we introduce to formulate privacy guarantees appropriate for sparse count data. We develop an MCMC algorithm that approximates the locally private posterior over model parameters given data that has been locally privatized by the geometric mechanism (Ghosh et al., 2012). Our solution is based on two insights: 1) a novel reinterpretation of the geometric mechanism in terms of the Skellam distribution (Skellam, 1946) and 2) a general theorem that relates the Skellam to the Bessel distribution (Yuan & Kalbfleisch, 2000). We demonstrate our method in two case studies on real-world email data in which we show that our method consistently outperforms the commonly-used naive approach, obtaining higher quality topics in text and more accurate link prediction in networks. On some tasks, our privacy-preserving method even outperforms non-private inference which conditions on the true data.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.
9 papers.
- 2023How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacycited by 150
- 2021The Skellam Mechanism for Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 66
- 2025Differential privacy for medical deep learning: methods, tradeoffs, and deployment implicationscited by 7
- 2021Differentially Private Bayesian Neural Networks on Accuracy, Privacy and Reliabilitycited by 6
- 2025Technical and Legal Aspects of Federated Learning in Bioinformatics: Applications, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 2
- 2021Doubly Non-Central Beta Matrix Factorization for DNA Methylation Datacited by 1
- 2021Locally Differentially Private Bayesian Inferencecited by 1
- 2024Scaling up Dynamic Edge Partition Models via Stochastic Gradient MCMCcited by 0
- 2025Optimal Survey Design for Private Mean Estimationcited by 0
- 2025Differential privacy for medical deep learning: methods, tradeoffs, and deployment implications31 May 2025
- 2025Technical and Legal Aspects of Federated Learning in Bioinformatics: Applications, Challenges and Opportunities12 Mar 2025
- 2025Optimal Survey Design for Private Mean Estimation30 Jan 2025
- 2024Scaling up Dynamic Edge Partition Models via Stochastic Gradient MCMC29 Feb 2024
- 2023How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacy1 Mar 2023
- 2021Locally Differentially Private Bayesian Inference27 Oct 2021
- 2021The Skellam Mechanism for Differentially Private Federated Learning11 Oct 2021
- 2021Differentially Private Bayesian Neural Networks on Accuracy, Privacy and Reliability18 Jul 2021
- 2021Doubly Non-Central Beta Matrix Factorization for DNA Methylation Data12 Jun 2021