mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Assessing Shape Bias Property of Convolutional Neural Networks

arXiv 1803.07739 ↗First posted 21 Mar 2018cs.CVcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is known that humans display "shape bias" when classifying new items, i.e., they prefer to categorize objects based on their shape rather than color. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are also designed to take into account the spatial structure of image data. In fact, experiments on image datasets, consisting of triples of a probe image, a shape-match and a color-match, have shown that one-shot learning models display shape bias as well. In this paper, we examine the shape bias property of CNNs. In order to conduct large scale experiments, we propose using the model accuracy on images with reversed brightness as a metric to evaluate the shape bias property. Such images, called negative images, contain objects that have the same shape as original images, but with different colors. Through extensive systematic experiments, we investigate the role of different factors, such as training data, model architecture, initialization and regularization techniques, on the shape bias property of CNNs. We show that it is possible to design different CNNs that achieve similar accuracy on original images, but perform significantly different on negative images, suggesting that CNNs do not intrinsically display shape bias. We then show that CNNs are able to learn and generalize the structures, when the model is properly initialized or data is properly augmented, and if batch normalization is used.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

18 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023X-Adv: Physical Adversarial Object Attacks against X-ray Prohibited Item Detectioncited by 58
  2. 2024LucidPPN: Unambiguous Prototypical Parts Network for User-centric Interpretable Computer Visioncited by 15
  3. 2021The Emergence of the Shape Bias Results from Communicative Efficiencycited by 13
  4. 2025Do We Always Need the Simplicity Bias? Looking for Optimal Inductive Biases in the Wildcited by 13
  5. 2023Convolutional Neural Networks Rarely Learn Shape for Semantic Segmentationcited by 12
  6. 2023Understanding Segment Anything Model: SAM is Biased Towards Texture Rather than Shapecited by 10
  7. 2024Can CLIP Count Stars? An Empirical Study on Quantity Bias in CLIPcited by 9
  8. 2021Shape-Biased Domain Generalization via Shock Graph Embeddingscited by 6
  9. 2025A Mathematical Philosophy of Explanations in Mechanistic Interpretability -- The Strange Science Part I.icited by 6
  10. 2025Decomposing and Revising What Language Models Generatecited by 2
  11. 2025GeoPE:A Unified Geometric Positional Embedding for Structured Tensorscited by 2
  12. 2022Abutting Grating Illusion: Cognitive Challenge to Neural Network Modelscited by 1
6 more
  1. 2024Will the Inclusion of Generated Data Amplify Bias Across Generations in Future Image Classification Models?cited by 1
  2. 2022SSR-GNNs: Stroke-based Sketch Representation with Graph Neural Networkscited by 0
  3. 2023On the ability of CNNs to extract color invariant intensity based features for image classificationcited by 0
  4. 2024On the Influence of Shape, Texture and Color for Learning Semantic Segmentationcited by 0
  5. 2024Contrast All the Time: Learning Time Series Representation from Temporal Consistencycited by 0
  6. 2026ShapeY: A Principled Framework for Measuring Shape Recognition Capacity via Nearest-Neighbor Matchingcited by 0