RankDCG: Rank-Ordering Evaluation Measure
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ranking is used for a wide array of problems, most notably information retrieval (search). There are a number of popular approaches to the evaluation of ranking such as Kendall's τ, Average Precision, and nDCG. When dealing with problems such as user ranking or recommendation systems, all these measures suffer from various problems, including an inability to deal with elements of the same rank, inconsistent and ambiguous lower bound scores, and an inappropriate cost function. We propose a new measure, rankDCG, that addresses these problems. This is a modification of the popular nDCG algorithm. We provide a number of criteria for any effective ranking algorithm and show that only rankDCG satisfies all of them. Results are presented on constructed and real data sets. We release a publicly available rankDCG evaluation package.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
4 papers.
- 2022A Neural Pairwise Ranking Model for Readability Assessmentcited by 14
- 2022Integrating Reward Maximization and Population Estimation: Sequential Decision-Making for Internal Revenue Service Audit Selectioncited by 5
- 2025Traits of a Leader: User Influence Level Prediction through Sociolinguistic Modelingcited by 0
- 2025Implementing Rational Choice Functions with LLMs and Measuring their Alignment with User Preferencescited by 0
- 2025Implementing Rational Choice Functions with LLMs and Measuring their Alignment with User Preferences22 Apr 2025
- 2025Traits of a Leader: User Influence Level Prediction through Sociolinguistic Modeling5 Jan 2025
- 2022Integrating Reward Maximization and Population Estimation: Sequential Decision-Making for Internal Revenue Service Audit Selection25 Apr 2022
- 2022A Neural Pairwise Ranking Model for Readability Assessment14 Mar 2022