mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Near-Optimal Sample Complexity Bounds for Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Multivariate Log-concave Densities

arXiv 1802.10575 ↗First posted 28 Feb 2018math.ST cs.IT cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of learning multivariate log-concave densities with respect to a global loss function. We obtain the first upper bound on the sample complexity of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) for a log-concave density on ℝd, for all d ≥ 4. Prior to this work, no finite sample upper bound was known for this estimator in more than 3 dimensions. In more detail, we prove that for any d ≥ 1 and ε>0, given tildeOd((1/ε)(d+3)/2) samples drawn from an unknown log-concave density f0 on ℝd, the MLE outputs a hypothesis h that with high probability is ε-close to f0, in squared Hellinger loss. A sample complexity lower bound of Omegad((1/ε)(d+1)/2) was previously known for any learning algorithm that achieves this guarantee. We thus establish that the sample complexity of the log-concave MLE is near-optimal, up to an tildeO(1/ε) factor.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.