SAFFRON: an adaptive algorithm for online control of the false discovery rate
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the online false discovery rate (FDR) problem, one observes a possibly infinite sequence of p-values P1,P2,dots, each testing a different null hypothesis, and an algorithm must pick a sequence of rejection thresholds α1,α2,dots in an online fashion, effectively rejecting the k-th null hypothesis whenever Pk ≤ αk. Importantly, αk must be a function of the past, and cannot depend on Pk or any of the later unseen p-values, and must be chosen to guarantee that for any time t, the FDR up to time t is less than some pre-determined quantity α ∈ (0,1). In this work, we present a powerful new framework for online FDR control that we refer to as SAFFRON. Like older alpha-investing (AI) algorithms, SAFFRON starts off with an error budget, called alpha-wealth, that it intelligently allocates to different tests over time, earning back some wealth on making a new discovery. However, unlike older methods, SAFFRON's threshold sequence is based on a novel estimate of the alpha fraction that it allocates to true null hypotheses. In the offline setting, algorithms that employ an estimate of the proportion of true nulls are called adaptive methods, and SAFFRON can be seen as an online analogue of the famous offline Storey-BH adaptive procedure. Just as Storey-BH is typically more powerful than the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) procedure under independence, we demonstrate that SAFFRON is also more powerful than its non-adaptive counterparts, such as LORD and other generalized alpha-investing algorithms. Further, a monotone version of the original AI algorithm is recovered as a special case of SAFFRON, that is often more stable and powerful than the original. Lastly, the derivation of SAFFRON provides a novel template for deriving new online FDR rules.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
11 papers.
- 2021Online false discovery rate control for anomaly detection in time seriescited by 13
- 2023Online multiple testing with e-valuescited by 12
- 2025Statistically Valid Post-Deployment Monitoring Should Be Standard for AI-Based Digital Healthcited by 8
- 2021Online Control of the False Discovery Rate under "Decision Deadlines"cited by 1
- 2021Online False Discovery Rate Control for LORD & SAFFRON Under Positive, Local Dependencecited by 1
- 2022Sequential algorithmic modification with test data reusecited by 0
- 2022Cost-aware Generalized α-investing for Multiple Hypothesis Testingcited by 0
- 2025Online Conformal Anomaly Detection with Prediction-Powered Data Acquisitioncited by 0
- 2026Online Selective Conformal Prediction with Asymmetric Rules: A Permutation Test Approachcited by 0
- 2026A Regret Perspective on Online Multiple Testingcited by 0
- 2026Always-On Experimentationcited by 0
- 2026Always-On Experimentation30 Sep 2026
- 2026A Regret Perspective on Online Multiple Testing13 May 2026
- 2026Online Selective Conformal Prediction with Asymmetric Rules: A Permutation Test Approach10 Feb 2026
- 2025Statistically Valid Post-Deployment Monitoring Should Be Standard for AI-Based Digital Health6 Jun 2025
- 2025Online Conformal Anomaly Detection with Prediction-Powered Data Acquisition3 May 2025
- 2023Online multiple testing with e-values10 Nov 2023
- 2022Cost-aware Generalized α-investing for Multiple Hypothesis Testing31 Oct 2022
- 2022Sequential algorithmic modification with test data reuse21 Mar 2022
- 2021Online false discovery rate control for anomaly detection in time series6 Dec 2021
- 2021Online False Discovery Rate Control for LORD & SAFFRON Under Positive, Local Dependence15 Oct 2021
- 2021Online Control of the False Discovery Rate under "Decision Deadlines"4 Oct 2021