An Algorithmic Framework to Control Bias in Bandit-based Personalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Personalization is pervasive in the online space as it leads to higher efficiency and revenue by allowing the most relevant content to be served to each user. However, recent studies suggest that personalization methods can propagate societal or systemic biases and polarize opinions; this has led to calls for regulatory mechanisms and algorithms to combat bias and inequality. Algorithmically, bandit optimization has enjoyed great success in learning user preferences and personalizing content or feeds accordingly. We propose an algorithmic framework that allows for the possibility to control bias or discrimination in such bandit-based personalization. Our model allows for the specification of general fairness constraints on the sensitive types of the content that can be displayed to a user. The challenge, however, is to come up with a scalable and low regret algorithm for the constrained optimization problem that arises. Our main technical contribution is a provably fast and low-regret algorithm for the fairness-constrained bandit optimization problem. Our proofs crucially leverage the special structure of our problem. Experiments on synthetic and real-world data sets show that our algorithmic framework can control bias with only a minor loss to revenue.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2021Fairness of Exposure in Stochastic Banditscited by 43
- 2021Achieving Counterfactual Fairness for Causal Banditcited by 15
- 2022Don't Throw it Away! The Utility of Unlabeled Data in Fair Decision Makingcited by 13
- 2022The price of unfairness in linear bandits with biased feedbackcited by 3
- 2022Contextual bandits with concave rewards, and an application to fair rankingcited by 2
- 2025From Personalization to Prejudice: Bias and Discrimination in Memory-Enhanced AI Agents for Recruitmentcited by 1
- 2025From Personalization to Prejudice: Bias and Discrimination in Memory-Enhanced AI Agents for Recruitment18 Dec 2025
- 2022Contextual bandits with concave rewards, and an application to fair ranking18 Oct 2022
- 2022Don't Throw it Away! The Utility of Unlabeled Data in Fair Decision Making10 May 2022
- 2022The price of unfairness in linear bandits with biased feedback18 Mar 2022
- 2021Achieving Counterfactual Fairness for Causal Bandit21 Sep 2021
- 2021Fairness of Exposure in Stochastic Bandits3 Mar 2021