mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Uniqueness of DRS as the 2 Operator Resolvent-Splitting and Impossibility of 3 Operator Resolvent-Splitting

arXiv 1802.07534 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2018math.OCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Given the success of Douglas--Rachford splitting (DRS), it is natural to ask whether DRS can be generalized. Are there other 2 operator resolvent-splittings sharing the favorable properties of DRS? Can DRS be generalized to 3 operators? This work presents the answers: no and no. In a certain sense, DRS is the unique 2 operator resolvent-splitting, and generalizing DRS to 3 operators is impossible without lifting, where lifting roughly corresponds to enlarging the problem size. The impossibility result further raises a question. How much lifting is necessary to generalize DRS to 3 operators? This work presents the answer by providing a novel 3 operator resolvent-splitting with provably minimal lifting that directly generalizes DRS.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.