Uniqueness of DRS as the 2 Operator Resolvent-Splitting and Impossibility of 3 Operator Resolvent-Splitting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Given the success of Douglas--Rachford splitting (DRS), it is natural to ask whether DRS can be generalized. Are there other 2 operator resolvent-splittings sharing the favorable properties of DRS? Can DRS be generalized to 3 operators? This work presents the answers: no and no. In a certain sense, DRS is the unique 2 operator resolvent-splitting, and generalizing DRS to 3 operators is impossible without lifting, where lifting roughly corresponds to enlarging the problem size. The impossibility result further raises a question. How much lifting is necessary to generalize DRS to 3 operators? This work presents the answer by providing a novel 3 operator resolvent-splitting with provably minimal lifting that directly generalizes DRS.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Bregman Douglas-Rachford Splitting Methodcited by 2
- 2025Bregman Douglas-Rachford Splitting Method10 Sep 2025