Bandit Learning with Positive Externalities
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In many platforms, user arrivals exhibit a self-reinforcing behavior: future user arrivals are likely to have preferences similar to users who were satisfied in the past. In other words, arrivals exhibit positive externalities. We study multiarmed bandit (MAB) problems with positive externalities. We show that the self-reinforcing preferences may lead standard benchmark algorithms such as UCB to exhibit linear regret. We develop a new algorithm, Balanced Exploration (BE), which explores arms carefully to avoid suboptimal convergence of arrivals before sufficient evidence is gathered. We also introduce an adaptive variant of BE which successively eliminates suboptimal arms. We analyze their asymptotic regret, and establish optimality by showing that no algorithm can perform better.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
5 papers.
- 2023Online Recommendations for Agents with Discounted Adaptive Preferencescited by 5
- 2024Learning to Mitigate Externalities: the Coase Theorem with Hindsight Rationalitycited by 3
- 2021Incentivized Bandit Learning with Self-Reinforcing User Preferencescited by 2
- 2021Batched Bandits with Crowd Externalitiescited by 0
- 2024Influencing Bandits: Arm Selection for Preference Shapingcited by 0
- 2024Learning to Mitigate Externalities: the Coase Theorem with Hindsight Rationality28 Jun 2024
- 2024Influencing Bandits: Arm Selection for Preference Shaping29 Feb 2024
- 2023Online Recommendations for Agents with Discounted Adaptive Preferences12 Feb 2023
- 2021Batched Bandits with Crowd Externalities29 Sep 2021
- 2021Incentivized Bandit Learning with Self-Reinforcing User Preferences19 May 2021