mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding the Role of Adaptivity in Machine Teaching: The Case of Version Space Learners

arXiv 1802.05190 ↗First posted 14 Feb 2018cs.LGcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In real-world applications of education, an effective teacher adaptively chooses the next example to teach based on the learner's current state. However, most existing work in algorithmic machine teaching focuses on the batch setting, where adaptivity plays no role. In this paper, we study the case of teaching consistent, version space learners in an interactive setting. At any time step, the teacher provides an example, the learner performs an update, and the teacher observes the learner's new state. We highlight that adaptivity does not speed up the teaching process when considering existing models of version space learners, such as "worst-case" (the learner picks the next hypothesis randomly from the version space) and "preference-based" (the learner picks hypothesis according to some global preference). Inspired by human teaching, we propose a new model where the learner picks hypotheses according to some local preference defined by the current hypothesis. We show that our model exhibits several desirable properties, e.g., adaptivity plays a key role, and the learner's transitions over hypotheses are smooth/interpretable. We develop efficient teaching algorithms and demonstrate our results via simulation and user studies.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2019: 2; 2020: 0; 2021: 7; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area: