Cognitive Deficit of Deep Learning in Numerosity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Subitizing, or the sense of small natural numbers, is an innate cognitive function of humans and primates; it responds to visual stimuli prior to the development of any symbolic skills, language or arithmetic. Given successes of deep learning (DL) in tasks of visual intelligence and given the primitivity of number sense, a tantalizing question is whether DL can comprehend numbers and perform subitizing. But somewhat disappointingly, extensive experiments of the type of cognitive psychology demonstrate that the examples-driven black box DL cannot see through superficial variations in visual representations and distill the abstract notion of natural number, a task that children perform with high accuracy and confidence. The failure is apparently due to the learning method not the CNN computational machinery itself. A recurrent neural network capable of subitizing does exist, which we construct by encoding a mechanism of mathematical morphology into the CNN convolutional kernels. Also, we investigate, using subitizing as a test bed, the ways to aid the black box DL by cognitive priors derived from human insight. Our findings are mixed and interesting, pointing to both cognitive deficit of pure DL, and some measured successes of boosting DL by predetermined cognitive implements. This case study of DL in cognitive computing is meaningful for visual numerosity represents a minimum level of human intelligence.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Towards Learning Abductive Reasoning using VSA Distributed Representationscited by 9
- 2024Towards Learning to Reason: Comparing LLMs with Neuro-Symbolic on Arithmetic Relations in Abstract Reasoningcited by 7
- 2023Towards Generalization in Subitizing with Neuro-Symbolic Loss using Holographic Reduced Representationscited by 4
- 2022Do Neural Networks for Segmentation Understand Insideness?cited by 0
- 2024Towards Learning to Reason: Comparing LLMs with Neuro-Symbolic on Arithmetic Relations in Abstract Reasoning7 Dec 2024
- 2024Towards Learning Abductive Reasoning using VSA Distributed Representations27 Jun 2024
- 2023Towards Generalization in Subitizing with Neuro-Symbolic Loss using Holographic Reduced Representations23 Dec 2023
- 2022Do Neural Networks for Segmentation Understand Insideness?25 Jan 2022