mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Path Consistency Learning in Tsallis Entropy Regularized MDPs

arXiv 1802.03501 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2018cs.AI cs.LG stat.MLcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the sparse entropy-regularized reinforcement learning (ERL) problem in which the entropy term is a special form of the Tsallis entropy. The optimal policy of this formulation is sparse, i.e.,~at each state, it has non-zero probability for only a small number of actions. This addresses the main drawback of the standard Shannon entropy-regularized RL (soft ERL) formulation, in which the optimal policy is softmax, and thus, may assign a non-negligible probability mass to non-optimal actions. This problem is aggravated as the number of actions is increased. In this paper, we follow the work of Nachum et al. (2017) in the soft ERL setting, and propose a class of novel path consistency learning (PCL) algorithms, called em sparse PCL, for the sparse ERL problem that can work with both on-policy and off-policy data. We first derive a em sparse consistency equation that specifies a relationship between the optimal value function and policy of the sparse ERL along any system trajectory. Crucially, a weak form of the converse is also true, and we quantify the sub-optimality of a policy which satisfies sparse consistency, and show that as we increase the number of actions, this sub-optimality is better than that of the soft ERL optimal policy. We then use this result to derive the sparse PCL algorithms. We empirically compare sparse PCL with its soft counterpart, and show its advantage, especially in problems with a large number of actions.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2018: 1; 2019: 0; 2020: 0; 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Offline RL with No OOD Actions: In-Sample Learning via Implicit Value Regularizationcited by 114
  2. 2021Policy Mirror Descent for Regularized Reinforcement Learning: A Generalized Framework with Linear Convergencecited by 83
  3. 2021Estimating Optimal Infinite Horizon Dynamic Treatment Regimes via pT-Learningcited by 26
  4. 2022Your Policy Regularizer is Secretly an Adversarycited by 21
  5. 2024Improved Off-policy Reinforcement Learning in Biological Sequence Designcited by 13
  6. 2018Maximum Causal Tsallis Entropy Imitation Learningcited by 10
  7. 2023Quasi-optimal Reinforcement Learning with Continuous Actionscited by 7
  8. 2024Continuous-time q-Learning for Jump-Diffusion Models under Tsallis Entropycited by 7
  9. 2026Provably Efficient Regularized Online RLHF with Generalized Bilinear Preferencescited by 5
  10. 2025Divergence-Augmented Policy Optimizationcited by 4
  11. 2024Learning accurate and interpretable tree-based modelscited by 3
  12. 2024q-exponential family for policy optimizationcited by 2
10 more
  1. 2025Discrete Compositional Generation via General Soft Operators and Robust Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  2. 2023Generalized Munchausen Reinforcement Learning using Tsallis KL Divergencecited by 1
  3. 2025On the Effect of Regularization in Policy Mirror Descentcited by 1
  4. 2026Perspectives on Tsallis Statistics for Artificial Intelligencecited by 1
  5. 2022q-Munchausen Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  6. 2022Enforcing KL Regularization in General Tsallis Entropy Reinforcement Learning via Advantage Learningcited by 0
  7. 2023Bridging the Gap between Newton-Raphson Method and Regularized Policy Iterationcited by 0
  8. 2026How Fast Should a Model Commit to Supervision? Training Reasoning Models on the Tsallis Loss Continuumcited by 0
  9. 2026Rationalizing Boltzmann Rationality: An Axiomatic Characterization of Entropy-Regularized Policiescited by 0
  10. 2026Fast Regularized Policy Mirror Descent with One-Step TD Updatescited by 0