Neyman-Pearson classification: parametrics and sample size requirement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Neyman-Pearson (NP) paradigm in binary classification seeks classifiers that achieve a minimal type II error while enforcing the prioritized type I error controlled under some user-specified level α. This paradigm serves naturally in applications such as severe disease diagnosis and spam detection, where people have clear priorities among the two error types. Recently, Tong, Feng and Li (2018) proposed a nonparametric umbrella algorithm that adapts all scoring-type classification methods (e.g., logistic regression, support vector machines, random forest) to respect the given type I error upper bound α with high probability, without specific distributional assumptions on the features and the responses. Universal the umbrella algorithm is, it demands an explicit minimum sample size requirement on class 0, which is often the more scarce class, such as in rare disease diagnosis applications. In this work, we employ the parametric linear discriminant analysis (LDA) model and propose a new parametric thresholding algorithm, which does not need the minimum sample size requirements on class 0 observations and thus is suitable for small sample applications such as rare disease diagnosis. Leveraging both the existing nonparametric and the newly proposed parametric thresholding rules, we propose four LDA-based NP classifiers, for both low- and high-dimensional settings. On the theoretical front, we prove NP oracle inequalities for one proposed classifier, where the rate for excess type II error benefits from the explicit parametric model assumption. Furthermore, as NP classifiers involve a sample splitting step of class 0 observations, we construct a new adaptive sample splitting scheme that can be applied universally to NP classifiers, and this adaptive strategy reduces the type II error of these classifiers.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
8 papers.
- 2021Neyman-Pearson Multi-class Classification via Cost-sensitive Learningcited by 5
- 2025Feasible Learningcited by 5
- 2024Distribution-Free Rates in Neyman-Pearson Classificationcited by 3
- 2021Asymmetric error control under imperfect supervision: a label-noise-adjusted Neyman-Pearson umbrella algorithmcited by 2
- 2023GBM-based Bregman Proximal Algorithms for Constrained Learningcited by 1
- 2026Progressive Power Homotopy for Non-convex Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Tightening Control in Neyman--Pearson Linear Classificationcited by 0
- 2026Classification with Abstention Under Class-Conditional Error Constraintscited by 0
- 2026Classification with Abstention Under Class-Conditional Error Constraints18 Sep 2026
- 2026Tightening Control in Neyman--Pearson Linear Classification3 Jul 2026
- 2026Progressive Power Homotopy for Non-convex Optimization22 Jan 2026
- 2025Feasible Learning24 Jan 2025
- 2024Distribution-Free Rates in Neyman-Pearson Classification14 Feb 2024
- 2023GBM-based Bregman Proximal Algorithms for Constrained Learning21 Aug 2023
- 2021Asymmetric error control under imperfect supervision: a label-noise-adjusted Neyman-Pearson umbrella algorithm1 Dec 2021
- 2021Neyman-Pearson Multi-class Classification via Cost-sensitive Learning8 Nov 2021