Allegation of scientific misconduct increases Twitter attention
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The web-based microblogging system Twitter is a very popular altmetrics source for measuring the broader impact of science. In this case study, we demonstrate how problematic the use of Twitter data for research evaluation can be, even though the aspiration of measurement is degraded from impact to attention measurement. We collected the Twitter data for the paper published by Yamamizu et al. (2017). An investigative committee found that the main figures in the paper are fraudulent.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.