Efficient Test Collection Construction via Active Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To create a new IR test collection at low cost, it is valuable to carefully select which documents merit human relevance judgments. Shared task campaigns such as NIST TREC pool document rankings from many participating systems (and often interactive runs as well) in order to identify the most likely relevant documents for human judging. However, if one's primary goal is merely to build a test collection, it would be useful to be able to do so without needing to run an entire shared task. Toward this end, we investigate multiple active learning strategies which, without reliance on system rankings: 1) select which documents human assessors should judge; and 2) automatically classify the relevance of additional unjudged documents. To assess our approach, we report experiments on five TREC collections with varying scarcity of relevant documents. We report labeling accuracy achieved, as well as rank correlation when evaluating participant systems based upon these labels vs. full pool judgments. Results show the effectiveness of our approach, and we further analyze how varying relevance scarcity across collections impacts our findings. To support reproducibility and follow-on work, we have shared our code online: https://github.com/mdmustafizurrahman/ICTIRALTestCollection2020/.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2021Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shiftcited by 55
- 2024On the Evaluation of Machine-Generated Reportscited by 23
- 2021An Information Retrieval Approach to Building Datasets for Hate Speech Detectioncited by 9
- 2021Low-Shot Validation: Active Importance Sampling for Estimating Classifier Performance on Rare Categoriescited by 7
- 2022Re-thinking Knowledge Graph Completion Evaluation from an Information Retrieval Perspectivecited by 7
- 2025Query Decomposition for RAG: Balancing Exploration-Exploitationcited by 5
- 2026Coverage, Not Averages: Semantic Stratification for Trustworthy Retrieval Evaluationcited by 2
- 2026Coverage, Not Averages: Semantic Stratification for Trustworthy Retrieval Evaluation22 Apr 2026
- 2025Query Decomposition for RAG: Balancing Exploration-Exploitation21 Oct 2025
- 2024On the Evaluation of Machine-Generated Reports2 May 2024
- 2022Re-thinking Knowledge Graph Completion Evaluation from an Information Retrieval Perspective9 May 2022
- 2021Low-Shot Validation: Active Importance Sampling for Estimating Classifier Performance on Rare Categories13 Sep 2021
- 2021Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shift1 Jul 2021
- 2021An Information Retrieval Approach to Building Datasets for Hate Speech Detection17 Jun 2021