mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Efficient Test Collection Construction via Active Learning

arXiv 1801.05605 ↗First posted 17 Jan 2018cs.IRcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To create a new IR test collection at low cost, it is valuable to carefully select which documents merit human relevance judgments. Shared task campaigns such as NIST TREC pool document rankings from many participating systems (and often interactive runs as well) in order to identify the most likely relevant documents for human judging. However, if one's primary goal is merely to build a test collection, it would be useful to be able to do so without needing to run an entire shared task. Toward this end, we investigate multiple active learning strategies which, without reliance on system rankings: 1) select which documents human assessors should judge; and 2) automatically classify the relevance of additional unjudged documents. To assess our approach, we report experiments on five TREC collections with varying scarcity of relevant documents. We report labeling accuracy achieved, as well as rank correlation when evaluating participant systems based upon these labels vs. full pool judgments. Results show the effectiveness of our approach, and we further analyze how varying relevance scarcity across collections impacts our findings. To support reproducibility and follow-on work, we have shared our code online: https://github.com/mdmustafizurrahman/ICTIRALTestCollection2020/.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

7 papers.