mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Less is More: Culling the Training Set to Improve Robustness of Deep Neural Networks

arXiv 1801.02850 ↗First posted 9 Jan 2018cs.CR cs.LG stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial examples. Prior defenses attempted to make deep networks more robust by either changing the network architecture or augmenting the training set with adversarial examples, but both have inherent limitations. Motivated by recent research that shows outliers in the training set have a high negative influence on the trained model, we studied the relationship between model robustness and the quality of the training set. We first show that outliers give the model better generalization ability but weaker robustness. Next, we propose an adversarial example detection framework, in which we design two methods for removing outliers from training set to obtain the sanitized model and then detect adversarial example by calculating the difference of outputs between the original and the sanitized model. We evaluated the framework on both MNIST and SVHN. Based on the difference measured by Kullback-Leibler divergence, we could detect adversarial examples with accuracy between 94.67% to 99.89%.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Jan 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1.

4 papers.