Face Flashing: a Secure Liveness Detection Protocol based on Light Reflections
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Face authentication systems are becoming increasingly prevalent, especially with the rapid development of Deep Learning technologies. However, human facial information is easy to be captured and reproduced, which makes face authentication systems vulnerable to various attacks. Liveness detection is an important defense technique to prevent such attacks, but existing solutions did not provide clear and strong security guarantees, especially in terms of time. To overcome these limitations, we propose a new liveness detection protocol called Face Flashing that significantly increases the bar for launching successful attacks on face authentication systems. By randomly flashing well-designed pictures on a screen and analyzing the reflected light, our protocol has leveraged physical characteristics of human faces: reflection processing at the speed of light, unique textual features, and uneven 3D shapes. Cooperating with working mechanism of the screen and digital cameras, our protocol is able to detect subtle traces left by an attacking process. To demonstrate the effectiveness of Face Flashing, we implemented a prototype and performed thorough evaluations with large data set collected from real-world scenarios. The results show that our Timing Verification can effectively detect the time gap between legitimate authentications and malicious cases. Our Face Verification can also differentiate 2D plane from 3D objects accurately. The overall accuracy of our liveness detection system is 98.8%, and its robustness was evaluated in different scenarios. In the worst case, our system's accuracy decreased to a still-high 97.3%.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
7 papers.
- 2022Seeing is Living? Rethinking the Security of Facial Liveness Verification in the Deepfake Eracited by 26
- 2022Digital and Physical Face Attacks: Reviewing and One Step Furthercited by 17
- 2023M3FAS: An Accurate and Robust MultiModal Mobile Face Anti-Spoofing Systemcited by 5
- 2023Blaming Humans and Machines: What Shapes People's Reactions to Algorithmic Harmcited by 5
- 2024Principles of Designing Robust Remote Face Anti-Spoofing Systemscited by 2
- 2021Deep Learning meets Liveness Detection: Recent Advancements and Challengescited by 1
- 2021Towards Algorithmic Transparency: A Diversity Perspectivecited by 0
- 2024Principles of Designing Robust Remote Face Anti-Spoofing Systems6 Jun 2024
- 2023Blaming Humans and Machines: What Shapes People's Reactions to Algorithmic Harm5 Apr 2023
- 2023M3FAS: An Accurate and Robust MultiModal Mobile Face Anti-Spoofing System30 Jan 2023
- 2022Digital and Physical Face Attacks: Reviewing and One Step Further29 Sep 2022
- 2022Seeing is Living? Rethinking the Security of Facial Liveness Verification in the Deepfake Era22 Feb 2022
- 2021Deep Learning meets Liveness Detection: Recent Advancements and Challenges29 Dec 2021
- 2021Towards Algorithmic Transparency: A Diversity Perspective12 Apr 2021