mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On Optimizing Operator Fusion Plans for Large-Scale Machine Learning in SystemML

arXiv 1801.00829 ↗First posted 2 Jan 2018cs.DBcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many large-scale machine learning (ML) systems allow specifying custom ML algorithms by means of linear algebra programs, and then automatically generate efficient execution plans. In this context, optimization opportunities for fused operators---in terms of fused chains of basic operators---are ubiquitous. These opportunities include (1) fewer materialized intermediates, (2) fewer scans of input data, and (3) the exploitation of sparsity across chains of operators. Automatic operator fusion eliminates the need for hand-written fused operators and significantly improves performance for complex or previously unseen chains of operations. However, existing fusion heuristics struggle to find good fusion plans for complex DAGs or hybrid plans of local and distributed operations. In this paper, we introduce an optimization framework for systematically reason about fusion plans that considers materialization points in DAGs, sparsity exploitation, different fusion template types, as well as local and distributed operations. In detail, we contribute algorithms for (1) candidate exploration of valid fusion plans, (2) cost-based candidate selection, and (3) code generation of local and distributed operations over dense, sparse, and compressed data. Our experiments in SystemML show end-to-end performance improvements with optimized fusion plans of up to 21x compared to hand-written fused operators, with negligible optimization and code generation overhead.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 0; 2023: 5; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: