mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dropout Feature Ranking for Deep Learning Models

arXiv 1712.08645 ↗First posted 22 Dec 2017cs.LG stat.MLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks (DNNs) achieve state-of-the-art results in a variety of domains. Unfortunately, DNNs are notorious for their non-interpretability, and thus limit their applicability in hypothesis-driven domains such as biology and healthcare. Moreover, in the resource-constraint setting, it is critical to design tests relying on fewer more informative features leading to high accuracy performance within reasonable budget. We aim to close this gap by proposing a new general feature ranking method for deep learning. We show that our simple yet effective method performs on par or compares favorably to eight strawman, classical and deep-learning feature ranking methods in two simulations and five very different datasets on tasks ranging from classification to regression, in both static and time series scenarios. We also illustrate the use of our method on a drug response dataset and show that it identifies genes relevant to the drug-response.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort: