Different approaches to community detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A precise definition of what constitutes a community in networks has remained elusive. Consequently, network scientists have compared community detection algorithms on benchmark networks with a particular form of community structure and classified them based on the mathematical techniques they employ. However, this comparison can be misleading because apparent similarities in their mathematical machinery can disguise different reasons for why we would want to employ community detection in the first place. Here we provide a focused review of these different motivations that underpin community detection. This problem-driven classification is useful in applied network science, where it is important to select an appropriate algorithm for the given purpose. Moreover, highlighting the different approaches to community detection also delineates the many lines of research and points out open directions and avenues for future research.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Modularity maximisation for graphonscited by 1
- 2024Scalable Community Detection Using Quantum Hamiltonian Descent and QUBO Formulationcited by 1
- 2021Synwalk -- Community Detection via Random Walk Modellingcited by 0
- 2021The Hyperspherical Geometry of Community Detection: Modularity as a Distancecited by 0
- 2024Scalable Community Detection Using Quantum Hamiltonian Descent and QUBO Formulation22 Nov 2024
- 2021The Hyperspherical Geometry of Community Detection: Modularity as a Distance6 Jul 2021
- 2021Synwalk -- Community Detection via Random Walk Modelling21 Jan 2021
- 2021Modularity maximisation for graphons2 Jan 2021