mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

"Active-set complexity" of proximal gradient: How long does it take to find the sparsity pattern?

arXiv 1712.03577 ↗First posted 10 Dec 2017math.OCcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Proximal gradient methods have been found to be highly effective for solving minimization problems with non-negative constraints or L1-regularization. Under suitable nondegeneracy conditions, it is known that these algorithms identify the optimal sparsity pattern for these types of problems in a finite number of iterations. However, it is not known how many iterations this may take. We introduce the notion of the "active-set complexity", which in these cases is the number of iterations before an algorithm is guaranteed to have identified the final sparsity pattern. We further give a bound on the active-set complexity of proximal gradient methods in the common case of minimizing the sum of a strongly-convex smooth function and a separable convex non-smooth function.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

7 papers.