Topic Modelling of Everyday Sexism Project Entries
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Everyday Sexism Project documents everyday examples of sexism reported by volunteer contributors from all around the world. It collected 100,000 entries in 13+ languages within the first 3 years of its existence. The content of reports in various languages submitted to Everyday Sexism is a valuable source of crowdsourced information with great potential for feminist and gender studies. In this paper, we take a computational approach to analyze the content of reports. We use topic-modelling techniques to extract emerging topics and concepts from the reports, and to map the semantic relations between those topics. The resulting picture closely resembles and adds to that arrived at through qualitative analysis, showing that this form of topic modeling could be useful for sifting through datasets that had not previously been subject to any analysis. More precisely, we come up with a map of topics for two different resolutions of our topic model and discuss the connection between the identified topics. In the low resolution picture, for instance, we found Public space/Street, Online, Work related/Office, Transport, School, Media harassment, and Domestic abuse. Among these, the strongest connection is between Public space/Street harassment and Domestic abuse and sexism in personal relationships.The strength of the relationships between topics illustrates the fluid and ubiquitous nature of sexism, with no single experience being unrelated to another.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
3 papers.
- 2021A Query-Driven Topic Modelcited by 5
- 2024Divided by discipline? A systematic literature review on the quantification of online sexism and misogyny using a semi-automated approachcited by 2
- 2021The Kaleidoscope of Privacy: Differences across French, German, UK, and US GDPR Media Discoursecited by 0
- 2024Divided by discipline? A systematic literature review on the quantification of online sexism and misogyny using a semi-automated approach30 Sep 2024
- 2021A Query-Driven Topic Model28 May 2021
- 2021The Kaleidoscope of Privacy: Differences across French, German, UK, and US GDPR Media Discourse31 Mar 2021