mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Computing the quality of the Laplace approximation

arXiv 1711.08911 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2017stat.ML math.ST stat.THcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Bayesian inference requires approximation methods to become computable, but for most of them it is impossible to quantify how close the approximation is to the true posterior. In this work, we present a theorem upper-bounding the KL divergence between a log-concave target density fleft(boldsymbolθright) and its Laplace approximation gleft(boldsymbolθright). The bound we present is computable: on the classical logistic regression model, we find our bound to be almost exact as long as the dimensionality of the parameter space is high. The approach we followed in this work can be extended to other Gaussian approximations, as we will do in an extended version of this work, to be submitted to the Annals of Statistics. It will then become a critical tool for characterizing whether, for a given problem, a given Gaussian approximation is suitable, or whether a more precise alternative method should be used instead.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.

1 paper.