mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robust Decentralized Secondary Frequency Control in Power Systems: Merits and Trade-Offs

arXiv 1711.07332 ↗First posted 20 Nov 2017math.OCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Frequency restoration in power systems is conventionally performed by broadcasting a centralized signal to local controllers. As a result of the energy transition, technological advances, and the scientific interest in distributed control and optimization methods, a plethora of distributed frequency control strategies have been proposed recently that rely on communication amongst local controllers. In this paper we propose a fully decentralized leaky integral controller for frequency restoration that is derived from a classic lag element. We study steady-state, asymptotic optimality, nominal stability, input-to-state stability, noise rejection, transient performance, and robustness properties of this controller in closed loop with a nonlinear and multivariable power system model. We demonstrate that the leaky integral controller can strike an acceptable trade-off between performance and robustness as well as between asymptotic disturbance rejection and transient convergence rate by tuning its DC gain and time constant. We compare our findings to conventional decentralized integral control and distributed-averaging-based integral control in theory and simulations.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.