Brain Extraction from Normal and Pathological Images: A Joint PCA/Image-Reconstruction Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Brain extraction from images is a common pre-processing step. Many approaches exist, but they are frequently only designed to perform brain extraction from images without strong pathologies. Extracting the brain from images with strong pathologies, for example, the presence of a tumor or of a traumatic brain injury, is challenging. In such cases, tissue appearance may deviate from normal tissue and violates algorithmic assumptions for these approaches; hence, the brain may not be correctly extracted. This paper proposes a brain extraction approach which can explicitly account for pathologies by jointly modeling normal tissue and pathologies. Specifically, our model uses a three-part image decomposition: (1) normal tissue appearance is captured by principal component analysis, (2) pathologies are captured via a total variation term, and (3) non-brain tissue is captured by a sparse term. Decomposition and image registration steps are alternated to allow statistical modeling in a fixed atlas space. As a beneficial side effect, the model allows for the identification of potential pathologies and the reconstruction of a quasi-normal image in atlas space. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on four datasets: the IBSR and LPBA40 datasets which show normal images, the BRATS dataset containing images with brain tumors and a dataset containing clinical TBI images. We compare the performance with other popular models: ROBEX, BEaST, MASS, BET, BSE and a recently proposed deep learning approach. Our model performs better than these competing methods on all four datasets. Specifically, our model achieves the best median (97.11) and mean (96.88) Dice scores over all datasets. The two best performing competitors, ROBEX and MASS, achieve scores of 96.23/95.62 and 96.67/94.25 respectively. Hence, our approach is an effective method for high quality brain extraction on a wide variety of images.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 2.
6 papers.
- 2022Federated Learning Enables Big Data for Rare Cancer Boundary Detectioncited by 84
- 2021Generative Adversarial Registration for Improved Conditional Deformable Templatescited by 31
- 2021GaNDLF: A Generally Nuanced Deep Learning Framework for Scalable End-to-End Clinical Workflows in Medical Imagingcited by 25
- 2023Neuralizer: General Neuroimage Analysis without Re-Trainingcited by 24
- 2023MetaRegNet: Metamorphic Image Registration Using Flow-Driven Residual Networkscited by 2
- 2021Spot the Difference: Detection of Topological Changes via Geometric Alignmentcited by 0
- 2023Neuralizer: General Neuroimage Analysis without Re-Training4 May 2023
- 2023MetaRegNet: Metamorphic Image Registration Using Flow-Driven Residual Networks16 Mar 2023
- 2022Federated Learning Enables Big Data for Rare Cancer Boundary Detection22 Apr 2022
- 2021Spot the Difference: Detection of Topological Changes via Geometric Alignment9 Jun 2021
- 2021Generative Adversarial Registration for Improved Conditional Deformable Templates7 May 2021
- 2021GaNDLF: A Generally Nuanced Deep Learning Framework for Scalable End-to-End Clinical Workflows in Medical Imaging26 Feb 2021