mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Lower bounds over Boolean inputs for deep neural networks with ReLU gates

arXiv 1711.03073 ↗First posted 8 Nov 2017cs.CC cs.LG cs.NEcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Motivated by the resurgence of neural networks in being able to solve complex learning tasks we undertake a study of high depth networks using ReLU gates which implement the function x mapsto max0,x. We try to understand the role of depth in such neural networks by showing size lowerbounds against such network architectures in parameter regimes hitherto unexplored. In particular we show the following two main results about neural nets computing Boolean functions of input dimension n, 1. We use the method of random restrictions to show almost linear, Omega(ε2(1-δ)n1-δ), lower bound for completely weight unrestricted LTF-of-ReLU circuits to match the Andreev function on at least frac12 +ε fraction of the inputs for ε > √2fraclog^frac 22-δ(n)n for any δ ∈ (0,frac 1 2) 2. We use the method of sign-rank to show exponential in dimension lower bounds for ReLU circuits ending in a LTF gate and of depths upto O(nxi) with xi < frac18 with some restrictions on the weights in the bottom most layer. All other weights in these circuits are kept unrestricted. This in turns also implies the same lowerbounds for LTF circuits with the same architecture and the same weight restrictions on their bottom most layer. Along the way we also show that there exists a ℝ^ nrightarrow ℝ Sum-of-ReLU-of-ReLU function which Sum-of-ReLU neural nets can never represent no matter how large they are allowed to be.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

20 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Transformers Learn Shortcuts to Automatacited by 260
  2. 2021Towards Lower Bounds on the Depth of ReLU Neural Networkscited by 55
  3. 2023Lower Bounds on the Depth of Integral ReLU Neural Networks via Lattice Polytopescited by 36
  4. 2022Training Fully Connected Neural Networks is existsℝ-Completecited by 15
  5. 2023How Many Neurons Does it Take to Approximate the Maximum?cited by 12
  6. 2021ReLU Neural Networks of Polynomial Size for Exact Maximum Flow Computationcited by 11
  7. 2024On Minimal Depth in Neural Networkscited by 11
  8. 2025Depth-Bounds for Neural Networks via the Braid Arrangementcited by 11
  9. 2025Better Neural Network Expressivity: Subdividing the Simplexcited by 11
  10. 2024Neural Networks and (Virtual) Extended Formulationscited by 8
  11. 2021Size and Depth Separation in Approximating Benign Functions with Neural Networkscited by 7
  12. 2024Depth Separations in Neural Networks: Separating the Dimension from the Accuracycited by 4
8 more
  1. 2026A Depth Hierarchy for Computing the Maximum in ReLU Networks via Extremal Graph Theorycited by 3
  2. 2024Representing Piecewise-Linear Functions by Functions with Minimal Aritycited by 2
  3. 2026Shallower ReLU Network Representations via Exact Linear Algebracited by 2
  4. 2021VC dimension of partially quantized neural networks in the overparametrized regimecited by 1
  5. 2025Linear-Size Neural Network Representation of Piecewise Affine Functions in ℝ2cited by 1
  6. 2026Spiky Rank and Its Applications to Rigidity and Circuitscited by 0
  7. 2026Every Layer Counts: An Exponential L2 Depth Hierarchy for ReLU Networkscited by 0
  8. 2026Probabilistic Linear Explanationscited by 0