Almost Polynomial Hardness of Node-Disjoint Paths in Grids
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the classical Node-Disjoint Paths (NDP) problem, we are given an n-vertex graph G=(V,E), and a collection M=(s1,t1),ldots,(sk,tk) of pairs of its vertices, called source-destination, or demand pairs. The goal is to route as many of the demand pairs as possible, where to route a pair we need to select a path connecting it, so that all selected paths are disjoint in their vertices. The best current algorithm for NDP achieves an O(√n)-approximation, while, until recently, the best negative result was a factor Omega(log1/2-εn)-hardness of approximation, for any constant ε, unless NP subseteq ZPTIME(npoly log n). In a recent work, the authors have shown an improved 2^Omega(√log n)-hardness of approximation for NDP, unless NPsubseteq DTIME(nO(log n)), even if the underlying graph is a subgraph of a grid graph, and all source vertices lie on the boundary of the grid. Unfortunately, this result does not extend to grid graphs. The approximability of the NDP problem on grid graphs has remained a tantalizing open question, with the best current upper bound of tildeO(n1/4), and the best current lower bound of APX-hardness. In this paper we come close to resolving the approximability of NDP in general, and NDP in grids in particular. Our main result is that NDP is 2^Omega(log1-ε n)-hard to approximate for any constant ε, assuming that NPnotsubseteq RTIME(npolylog n), and that it is nOmega (1/(log log n)2)-hard to approximate, assuming that for some constant δ>0, NP not subseteq RTIME(2^nδ). These results hold even for grid graphs and wall graphs, and extend to the closely related Edge-Disjoint Paths problem, even in wall graphs.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.
- 2023The Parameterized Complexity of Coordinated Motion Planning12 Dec 2023