mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

The TensorFlow Partitioning and Scheduling Problem: It's the Critical Path!

arXiv 1711.01912 ↗First posted 6 Nov 2017cs.DCcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

State-of-the-art data flow systems such as TensorFlow impose iterative calculations on large graphs that need to be partitioned on heterogeneous devices such as CPUs, GPUs, and TPUs. However, partitioning can not be viewed in isolation. Each device has to select the next graph vertex to be executed, i.e., perform local scheduling decisions. Both problems, partitioning and scheduling, are NP-complete by themselves but have to be solved in combination in order to minimize overall execution time of an iteration. In this paper, we propose several heuristic strategies to solve the partitioning and scheduling problem in TensorFlow. We simulate the performance of the proposed strategies in heterogeneous environments with communication-intensive workloads that are common to TensorFlow. Our findings indicate that the best partitioning and scheduling heuristics are those that focus on minimizing the execution time of the critical path in the graph. Those strategies provide a speed-up of up to 4 times in comparison to strategies that are agnostic to the critical path, such as hash-based partitioning and FIFO scheduling.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.

4 papers.