How Polarized Have We Become? A Multimodal Classification of Trump Followers and Clinton Followers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Polarization in American politics has been extensively documented and analyzed for decades, and the phenomenon became all the more apparent during the 2016 presidential election, where Trump and Clinton depicted two radically different pictures of America. Inspired by this gaping polarization and the extensive utilization of Twitter during the 2016 presidential campaign, in this paper we take the first step in measuring polarization in social media and we attempt to predict individuals' Twitter following behavior through analyzing ones' everyday tweets, profile images and posted pictures. As such, we treat polarization as a classification problem and study to what extent Trump followers and Clinton followers on Twitter can be distinguished, which in turn serves as a metric of polarization in general. We apply LSTM to processing tweet features and we extract visual features using the VGG neural network. Integrating these two sets of features boosts the overall performance. We are able to achieve an accuracy of 69%, suggesting that the high degree of polarization recorded in the literature has started to manifest itself in social media as well.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Structuring Quantitative Image Analysis with Object Prominence30 Aug 2024
- 2023Evolving linguistic divergence on polarizing social media4 Sep 2023
- 2023Party Prediction for Twitter25 Aug 2023
- 2022Explaining Deep Convolutional Neural Networks via Latent Visual-Semantic Filter Attention10 Apr 2022