mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Consistency of Lipschitz learning with infinite unlabeled data and finite labeled data

arXiv 1710.10364 ↗First posted 28 Oct 2017math.AP cs.LG cs.NAcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the consistency of Lipschitz learning on graphs in the limit of infinite unlabeled data and finite labeled data. Previous work has conjectured that Lipschitz learning is well-posed in this limit, but is insensitive to the distribution of the unlabeled data, which is undesirable for semi-supervised learning. We first prove that this conjecture is true in the special case of a random geometric graph model with kernel-based weights. Then we go on to show that on a random geometric graph with self-tuning weights, Lipschitz learning is in fact highly sensitive to the distribution of the unlabeled data, and we show how the degree of sensitivity can be adjusted by tuning the weights. In both cases, our results follow from showing that the sequence of learned functions converges to the viscosity solution of an ∞-Laplace type equation, and studying the structure of the limiting equation.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

15 papers.

Sort: