Safety-Aware Apprenticeship Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Apprenticeship learning (AL) is a kind of Learning from Demonstration techniques where the reward function of a Markov Decision Process (MDP) is unknown to the learning agent and the agent has to derive a good policy by observing an expert's demonstrations. In this paper, we study the problem of how to make AL algorithms inherently safe while still meeting its learning objective. We consider a setting where the unknown reward function is assumed to be a linear combination of a set of state features, and the safety property is specified in Probabilistic Computation Tree Logic (PCTL). By embedding probabilistic model checking inside AL, we propose a novel counterexample-guided approach that can ensure safety while retaining performance of the learnt policy. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on several challenging AL scenarios where safety is essential.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2021Learning from Demonstrations using Signal Temporal Logiccited by 17
- 2023Scalable Primal-Dual Actor-Critic Method for Safe Multi-Agent RL with General Utilitiescited by 15
- 2025A Survey of Safe Reinforcement Learning and Constrained MDPs: A Technical Survey on Single-Agent and Multi-Agent Safetycited by 12
- 2021Programmatic Reward Design by Examplecited by 9
- 2022A Hierarchical Bayesian Approach to Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Symbolic Reward Machinescited by 9
- 2022Learning Performance Graphs from Demonstrations via Task-Based Evaluationscited by 3
- 2024Rethinking Inverse Reinforcement Learning: from Data Alignment to Task Alignmentcited by 3
- 2023Signal Temporal Logic-Guided Apprenticeship Learningcited by 1
- 2022Safety-Aware Multi-Agent Apprenticeship Learningcited by 0
- 2023PAGAR: Taming Reward Misalignment in Inverse Reinforcement Learning-Based Imitation Learning with Protagonist Antagonist Guided Adversarial Rewardcited by 0
- 2023Probabilistic Counterexample Guidance for Safer Reinforcement Learning (Extended Version)cited by 0
- 2026Learning from Imperfect Demonstrations via Temporal Behavior Tree-Guided Trajectory Repaircited by 0
- 2026Learning from Imperfect Demonstrations via Temporal Behavior Tree-Guided Trajectory Repair5 Apr 2026
- 2025A Survey of Safe Reinforcement Learning and Constrained MDPs: A Technical Survey on Single-Agent and Multi-Agent Safety22 May 2025
- 2024Rethinking Inverse Reinforcement Learning: from Data Alignment to Task Alignment31 Oct 2024
- 2023Signal Temporal Logic-Guided Apprenticeship Learning9 Nov 2023
- 2023Probabilistic Counterexample Guidance for Safer Reinforcement Learning (Extended Version)10 Jul 2023
- 2023PAGAR: Taming Reward Misalignment in Inverse Reinforcement Learning-Based Imitation Learning with Protagonist Antagonist Guided Adversarial Reward2 Jun 2023
- 2023Scalable Primal-Dual Actor-Critic Method for Safe Multi-Agent RL with General Utilities27 May 2023
- 2022A Hierarchical Bayesian Approach to Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Symbolic Reward Machines20 Apr 2022
- 2022Learning Performance Graphs from Demonstrations via Task-Based Evaluations12 Apr 2022
- 2022Safety-Aware Multi-Agent Apprenticeship Learning20 Jan 2022
- 2021Programmatic Reward Design by Example14 Dec 2021
- 2021Learning from Demonstrations using Signal Temporal Logic15 Feb 2021