Fishing for Clickbaits in Social Images and Texts with Linguistically-Infused Neural Network Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper presents the results and conclusions of our participation in the Clickbait Challenge 2017 on automatic clickbait detection in social media. We first describe linguistically-infused neural network models and identify informative representations to predict the level of clickbaiting present in Twitter posts. Our models allow to answer the question not only whether a post is a clickbait or not, but to what extent it is a clickbait post e.g., not at all, slightly, considerably, or heavily clickbaity using a score ranging from 0 to 1. We evaluate the predictive power of models trained on varied text and image representations extracted from tweets. Our best performing model that relies on the tweet text and linguistic markers of biased language extracted from the tweet and the corresponding page yields mean squared error (MSE) of 0.04, mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.16 and R2 of 0.43 on the held-out test data. For the binary classification setup (clickbait vs. non-clickbait), our model achieved F1 score of 0.69. We have not found that image representations combined with text yield significant performance improvement yet. Nevertheless, this work is the first to present preliminary analysis of objects extracted using Google Tensorflow object detection API from images in clickbait vs. non-clickbait Twitter posts. Finally, we outline several steps to improve model performance as a part of the future work.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2.
2 papers.
- 2021Is it a click bait? Let's predict using Machine Learningcited by 0
- 2021Clickbait Detection in YouTube Videoscited by 0
- 2021Clickbait Detection in YouTube Videos26 Jul 2021
- 2021Is it a click bait? Let's predict using Machine Learning1 Jun 2021