Combinatorial Penalties: Which structures are preserved by convex relaxations?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the homogeneous and the non-homogeneous convex relaxations for combinatorial penalty functions defined on support sets. Our study identifies key differences in the tightness of the resulting relaxations through the notion of the lower combinatorial envelope of a set-function along with new necessary conditions for support identification. We then propose a general adaptive estimator for convex monotone regularizers, and derive new sufficient conditions for support recovery in the asymptotic setting.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 3.
6 papers.
- 2021Only Train Once: A One-Shot Neural Network Training And Pruning Frameworkcited by 70
- 2022Neural Set Function Extensions: Learning with Discrete Functions in High Dimensionscited by 14
- 2021Maximizing approximately k-submodular functionscited by 4
- 2022Online Nonsubmodular Minimization with Delayed Costs: From Full Information to Bandit Feedbackcited by 1
- 2021Approximate Frank-Wolfe Algorithms over Graph-structured Support Setscited by 0
- 2022Online Subset Selection using α-Core with no Augmented Regretcited by 0
- 2022Online Subset Selection using α-Core with no Augmented Regret28 Sep 2022
- 2022Neural Set Function Extensions: Learning with Discrete Functions in High Dimensions8 Aug 2022
- 2022Online Nonsubmodular Minimization with Delayed Costs: From Full Information to Bandit Feedback15 May 2022
- 2021Only Train Once: A One-Shot Neural Network Training And Pruning Framework15 Jul 2021
- 2021Approximate Frank-Wolfe Algorithms over Graph-structured Support Sets29 Jun 2021
- 2021Maximizing approximately k-submodular functions18 Jan 2021