Equity in 311 Reporting: Understanding Socio-Spatial Differentials in the Propensity to Complain
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Cities across the United States are implementing information communication technologies in an effort to improve government services. One such innovation in e-government is the creation of 311 systems, offering a centralized platform where citizens can request services, report non-emergency concerns, and obtain information about the city via hotline, mobile, or web-based applications. The NYC 311 service request system represents one of the most significant links between citizens and city government, accounting for more than 8,000,000 requests annually. These systems are generating massive amounts of data that, when properly managed, cleaned, and mined, can yield significant insights into the real-time condition of the city. Increasingly, these data are being used to develop predictive models of citizen concerns and problem conditions within the city. However, predictive models trained on these data can suffer from biases in the propensity to make a request that can vary based on socio-economic and demographic characteristics of an area, cultural differences that can affect citizens' willingness to interact with their government, and differential access to Internet connectivity. Using more than 20,000,000 311 requests - together with building violation data from the NYC Department of Buildings and the NYC Department of Housing Preservation and Development; property data from NYC Department of City Planning; and demographic and socioeconomic data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey - we develop a two-step methodology to evaluate the propensity to complain: (1) we predict, using a gradient boosting regression model, the likelihood of heating and hot water violations for a given building, and (2) we then compare the actual complaint volume for buildings with predicted violations to quantify discrepancies across the City.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022Quantifying Spatial Under-reporting Disparities in Resident Crowdsourcingcited by 7
- 2023A Bayesian Spatial Model to Correct Under-Reporting in Urban Crowdsourcingcited by 6
- 2025Bayesian Modeling of Zero-Shot Classifications for Urban Flood Detectioncited by 2
- 2025Urban Incident Prediction with Graph Neural Networks: Integrating Government Ratings and Crowdsourced Reportscited by 1
- 2025MuST2-Learn: Multi-view Spatial-Temporal-Type Learning for Heterogeneous Municipal Service Time Estimationcited by 0
- 2026Multi-Task Anti-Causal Learning for Reconstructing Urban Events from Residents' Reportscited by 0
- 2026Multi-Task Anti-Causal Learning for Reconstructing Urban Events from Residents' Reports12 Mar 2026
- 2025MuST2-Learn: Multi-view Spatial-Temporal-Type Learning for Heterogeneous Municipal Service Time Estimation22 Aug 2025
- 2025Urban Incident Prediction with Graph Neural Networks: Integrating Government Ratings and Crowdsourced Reports10 Jun 2025
- 2025Bayesian Modeling of Zero-Shot Classifications for Urban Flood Detection18 Mar 2025
- 2023A Bayesian Spatial Model to Correct Under-Reporting in Urban Crowdsourcing18 Dec 2023
- 2022Quantifying Spatial Under-reporting Disparities in Resident Crowdsourcing19 Apr 2022