Computational Differential Privacy from Lattice-based Cryptography
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The emerging technologies for large scale data analysis raise new challenges to the security and privacy of sensitive user data. In this work we investigate the problem of private statistical analysis of time-series data in the distributed and semi-honest setting. In particular, we study some properties of Private Stream Aggregation (PSA), first introduced by Shi et al. 2017. This is a computationally secure protocol for the collection and aggregation of data in a distributed network and has a very small communication cost. In the non-adaptive query model, a secure PSA scheme can be built upon any key-homomorphic weak pseudo-random function as shown by Valovich 2017, yielding security guarantees in the standard model which is in contrast to Shi et. al. We show that every mechanism which preserves (ε,δ)-differential privacy in effect preserves computational (ε,δ)-differential privacy when it is executed through a secure PSA scheme. Furthermore, we introduce a novel perturbation mechanism based on the symmetric Skellam distribution that is suited for preserving differential privacy in the distributed setting, and find that its performances in terms of privacy and accuracy are comparable to those of previous solutions. On the other hand, we leverage its specific properties to construct a computationally efficient prospective post-quantum protocol for differentially private time-series data analysis in the distributed model. The security of this protocol is based on the hardness of a new variant of the Decisional Learning with Errors (DLWE) problem. In this variant the errors are taken from the symmetric Skellam distribution. We show that this new variant is hard based on the hardness of the standard Learning with Errors (LWE) problem where the errors are taken from the discrete Gaussian distribution. Thus, we provide a variant of the LWE problem that is hard...
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
6 papers.
- 2021The Distributed Discrete Gaussian Mechanism for Federated Learning with Secure Aggregationcited by 127
- 2021The Skellam Mechanism for Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 66
- 2022Federated Learning with Sparsified Model Perturbation: Improving Accuracy under Client-Level Differential Privacycited by 32
- 2021Towards Sparse Federated Analytics: Location Heatmaps under Distributed Differential Privacy with Secure Aggregationcited by 10
- 2022Skellam Mixture Mechanism: a Novel Approach to Federated Learning with Differential Privacycited by 7
- 2024On Using Secure Aggregation in Differentially Private Federated Learning with Multiple Local Stepscited by 1
- 2024On Using Secure Aggregation in Differentially Private Federated Learning with Multiple Local Steps27 Jul 2024
- 2022Skellam Mixture Mechanism: a Novel Approach to Federated Learning with Differential Privacy8 Dec 2022
- 2022Federated Learning with Sparsified Model Perturbation: Improving Accuracy under Client-Level Differential Privacy15 Feb 2022
- 2021Towards Sparse Federated Analytics: Location Heatmaps under Distributed Differential Privacy with Secure Aggregation3 Nov 2021
- 2021The Skellam Mechanism for Differentially Private Federated Learning11 Oct 2021
- 2021The Distributed Discrete Gaussian Mechanism for Federated Learning with Secure Aggregation12 Feb 2021