Discourse Structure in Machine Translation Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this article, we explore the potential of using sentence-level discourse structure for machine translation evaluation. We first design discourse-aware similarity measures, which use all-subtree kernels to compare discourse parse trees in accordance with the Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST). Then, we show that a simple linear combination with these measures can help improve various existing machine translation evaluation metrics regarding correlation with human judgments both at the segment- and at the system-level. This suggests that discourse information is complementary to the information used by many of the existing evaluation metrics, and thus it could be taken into account when developing richer evaluation metrics, such as the WMT-14 winning combined metric DiscoTKparty. We also provide a detailed analysis of the relevance of various discourse elements and relations from the RST parse trees for machine translation evaluation. In particular we show that: (i) all aspects of the RST tree are relevant, (ii) nuclearity is more useful than relation type, and (iii) the similarity of the translation RST tree to the reference tree is positively correlated with translation quality.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2022DiscoScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT and Discourse Coherencecited by 35
- 2022Towards Explainable Evaluation Metrics for Natural Language Generationcited by 15
- 2021RST Parsing from Scratchcited by 13
- 2025Do LLMs Understand Your Translations? Evaluating Paragraph-level MT with Question Answeringcited by 9
- 2025Discourse-Driven Evaluation: Unveiling Factual Inconsistency in Long Document Summarizationcited by 8
- 2024Can we obtain significant success in RST discourse parsing by using Large Language Models?cited by 4
- 2026When Looks Do Not Lie: Discourse Structure Guided In-Context Learning for Faithful Diagram Generationcited by 0
- 2026When Looks Do Not Lie: Discourse Structure Guided In-Context Learning for Faithful Diagram Generation28 Jan 2026
- 2025Do LLMs Understand Your Translations? Evaluating Paragraph-level MT with Question Answering10 Apr 2025
- 2025Discourse-Driven Evaluation: Unveiling Factual Inconsistency in Long Document Summarization10 Feb 2025
- 2024Can we obtain significant success in RST discourse parsing by using Large Language Models?8 Mar 2024
- 2022Towards Explainable Evaluation Metrics for Natural Language Generation21 Mar 2022
- 2022DiscoScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT and Discourse Coherence26 Jan 2022
- 2021RST Parsing from Scratch23 May 2021