Fooling Vision and Language Models Despite Localization and Attention Mechanism
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial attacks are known to succeed on classifiers, but it has been an open question whether more complex vision systems are vulnerable. In this paper, we study adversarial examples for vision and language models, which incorporate natural language understanding and complex structures such as attention, localization, and modular architectures. In particular, we investigate attacks on a dense captioning model and on two visual question answering (VQA) models. Our evaluation shows that we can generate adversarial examples with a high success rate (i.e., > 90%) for these models. Our work sheds new light on understanding adversarial attacks on vision systems which have a language component and shows that attention, bounding box localization, and compositional internal structures are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. These observations will inform future work towards building effective defenses.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Diffusion-Based Adversarial Sample Generation for Improved Stealthiness and Controllabilitycited by 66
- 2023Instruct2Attack: Language-Guided Semantic Adversarial Attackscited by 16
- 2024Natural Language Induced Adversarial Imagescited by 4
- 2022Trace and Detect Adversarial Attacks on CNNs using Feature Response Mapscited by 1
- 2024Natural Language Induced Adversarial Images11 Oct 2024
- 2023Instruct2Attack: Language-Guided Semantic Adversarial Attacks27 Nov 2023
- 2023Diffusion-Based Adversarial Sample Generation for Improved Stealthiness and Controllability25 May 2023
- 2022Trace and Detect Adversarial Attacks on CNNs using Feature Response Maps24 Aug 2022