mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Protest Activity Detection and Perceived Violence Estimation from Social Media Images

arXiv 1709.06204 ↗First posted 18 Sep 2017cs.MM cs.CV cs.SIcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We develop a novel visual model which can recognize protesters, describe their activities by visual attributes and estimate the level of perceived violence in an image. Studies of social media and protests use natural language processing to track how individuals use hashtags and links, often with a focus on those items' diffusion. These approaches, however, may not be effective in fully characterizing actual real-world protests (e.g., violent or peaceful) or estimating the demographics of participants (e.g., age, gender, and race) and their emotions. Our system characterizes protests along these dimensions. We have collected geotagged tweets and their images from 2013-2017 and analyzed multiple major protest events in that period. A multi-task convolutional neural network is employed in order to automatically classify the presence of protesters in an image and predict its visual attributes, perceived violence and exhibited emotions. We also release the UCLA Protest Image Dataset, our novel dataset of 40,764 images (11,659 protest images and hard negatives) with various annotations of visual attributes and sentiments. Using this dataset, we train our model and demonstrate its effectiveness. We also present experimental results from various analysis on geotagged image data in several prevalent protest events. Our dataset will be made accessible at https://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/comm/jjoo/mm-protest/.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 5; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Safety of Multimodal Large Language Models on Images and Textscited by 70
  2. 2024UnsafeBench: Benchmarking Image Safety Classifiers on Real-World and AI-Generated Imagescited by 52
  3. 2023ToViLaG: Your Visual-Language Generative Model is Also An Evildoercited by 27
  4. 2023Deep Learning based Multi-Label Image Classification of Protest Activitiescited by 14
  5. 2021The Reasonable Crowd: Towards evidence-based and interpretable models of driving behaviorcited by 12
  6. 2022Ambiguous Images With Human Judgments for Robust Visual Event Classificationcited by 12
  7. 2022Explaining Deep Convolutional Neural Networks via Latent Visual-Semantic Filter Attentioncited by 11
  8. 2021Who Blames or Endorses Whom? Entity-to-Entity Directed Sentiment Extraction in News Textcited by 4
  9. 2025SafeVision: Efficient Image Guardrail with Robust Policy Adherence and Explainabilitycited by 4
  10. 2021Do You See What I See? Capabilities and Limits of Automated Multimedia Content Analysiscited by 2
  11. 2022Few-shot Learning for Multi-modal Social Media Event Filteringcited by 2
  12. 2024Improving Computer Vision Interpretability: Transparent Two-level Classification for Complex Scenescited by 2
8 more
  1. 2022Zero-Shot Ranking Socio-Political Texts with Transformer Language Models to Reduce Close Reading Timecited by 1
  2. 2025VModA: An Effective Framework for Adaptive NSFW Image Moderationcited by 1
  3. 2022Short Video Uprising: How #BlackLivesMatter Content on TikTok Challenges the Protest Paradigmcited by 0
  4. 2023LLVMs4Protest: Harnessing the Power of Large Language and Vision Models for Deciphering Protests in the Newscited by 0
  5. 2025Political Events using RAG with LLMscited by 0
  6. 2025Leveraging Generative Artificial Intelligence for Causal Inference with Unstructured Datacited by 0
  7. 2026Protecting and Preserving Protest Dynamics for Responsible Analysiscited by 0
  8. 2026When Seeing Overrides Knowing: Visual Dominance and Deferral-Based Method for Personalized Safety in VLMscited by 0