On the Protection of Private Information in Machine Learning Systems: Two Recent Approaches
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The recent, remarkable growth of machine learning has led to intense interest in the privacy of the data on which machine learning relies, and to new techniques for preserving privacy. However, older ideas about privacy may well remain valid and useful. This note reviews two recent works on privacy in the light of the wisdom of some of the early literature, in particular the principles distilled by Saltzer and Schroeder in the 1970s.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.
4 papers.
- 2021Survey: Leakage and Privacy at Inference Timecited by 44
- 2022Lifelong DP: Consistently Bounded Differential Privacy in Lifelong Machine Learningcited by 2
- 2024Inference Attacks: A Taxonomy, Survey, and Promising Directionscited by 2
- 2024DP-CDA: An Algorithm for Enhanced Privacy Preservation in Dataset Synthesis Through Randomized Mixingcited by 1
- 2024DP-CDA: An Algorithm for Enhanced Privacy Preservation in Dataset Synthesis Through Randomized Mixing25 Nov 2024
- 2024Inference Attacks: A Taxonomy, Survey, and Promising Directions4 Jun 2024
- 2022Lifelong DP: Consistently Bounded Differential Privacy in Lifelong Machine Learning26 Jul 2022
- 2021Survey: Leakage and Privacy at Inference Time4 Jul 2021