Predicting Aesthetic Score Distribution through Cumulative Jensen-Shannon Divergence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Aesthetic quality prediction is a challenging task in the computer vision community because of the complex interplay with semantic contents and photographic technologies. Recent studies on the powerful deep learning based aesthetic quality assessment usually use a binary high-low label or a numerical score to represent the aesthetic quality. However the scalar representation cannot describe well the underlying varieties of the human perception of aesthetics. In this work, we propose to predict the aesthetic score distribution (i.e., a score distribution vector of the ordinal basic human ratings) using Deep Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN). Conventional DCNNs which aim to minimize the difference between the predicted scalar numbers or vectors and the ground truth cannot be directly used for the ordinal basic rating distribution. Thus, a novel CNN based on the Cumulative distribution with Jensen-Shannon divergence (CJS-CNN) is presented to predict the aesthetic score distribution of human ratings, with a new reliability-sensitive learning method based on the kurtosis of the score distribution, which eliminates the requirement of the original full data of human ratings (without normalization). Experimental results on large scale aesthetic dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our introduced CJS-CNN in this task.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2020: 1; 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
9 papers.
- 2024Beyond correlation: The Impact of Human Uncertainty in Measuring the Effectiveness of Automatic Evaluation and LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 29
- 2024Quality Assessment in the Era of Large Models: A Surveycited by 26
- 2023Provable Benefits of Policy Learning from Human Preferences in Contextual Bandit Problemscited by 12
- 2021User-Guided Personalized Image Aesthetic Assessment based on Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
- 2021The Earth Mover's Pinball Loss: Quantiles for Histogram-Valued Regressioncited by 3
- 2020A Deep Drift-Diffusion Model for Image Aesthetic Score Distribution Predictioncited by 1
- 2025AesTest: Measuring Aesthetic Intelligence from Perception to Productioncited by 1
- 2021ADDS: Adaptive Differentiable Sampling for Robust Multi-Party Learningcited by 0
- 2022Aesthetic Attributes Assessment of Images with AMANv2 and DPC-CaptionsV2cited by 0
- 2025AesTest: Measuring Aesthetic Intelligence from Perception to Production9 Nov 2025
- 2024Beyond correlation: The Impact of Human Uncertainty in Measuring the Effectiveness of Automatic Evaluation and LLM-as-a-Judge3 Oct 2024
- 2024Quality Assessment in the Era of Large Models: A Survey17 Aug 2024
- 2023Provable Benefits of Policy Learning from Human Preferences in Contextual Bandit Problems24 Jul 2023
- 2022Aesthetic Attributes Assessment of Images with AMANv2 and DPC-CaptionsV29 Aug 2022
- 2021ADDS: Adaptive Differentiable Sampling for Robust Multi-Party Learning29 Oct 2021
- 2021User-Guided Personalized Image Aesthetic Assessment based on Deep Reinforcement Learning14 Jun 2021
- 2021The Earth Mover's Pinball Loss: Quantiles for Histogram-Valued Regression3 Jun 2021
- 2020A Deep Drift-Diffusion Model for Image Aesthetic Score Distribution Prediction15 Oct 2020