mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hyperspectral Unmixing: Ground Truth Labeling, Datasets, Benchmark Performances and Survey

arXiv 1708.05125 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2017cs.CVcited by 33

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hyperspectral unmixing (HU) is a very useful and increasingly popular preprocessing step for a wide range of hyperspectral applications. However, the HU research has been constrained a lot by three factors: (a) the number of hyperspectral images (especially the ones with ground truths) are very limited; (b) the ground truths of most hyperspectral images are not shared on the web, which may cause lots of unnecessary troubles for researchers to evaluate their algorithms; (c) the codes of most state-of-the-art methods are not shared, which may also delay the testing of new methods. Accordingly, this paper deals with the above issues from the following three perspectives: (1) as a profound contribution, we provide a general labeling method for the HU. With it, we labeled up to 15 hyperspectral images, providing 18 versions of ground truths. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to summarize and share up to 15 hyperspectral images and their 18 versions of ground truths for the HU. Observing that the hyperspectral classification (HyC) has much more standard datasets (whose ground truths are generally publicly shared) than the HU, we propose an interesting method to transform the HyC datasets for the HU research. (2) To further facilitate the evaluation of HU methods under different conditions, we reviewed and implemented the algorithm to generate a complex synthetic hyperspectral image. By tuning the hyper-parameters in the code, we may verify the HU methods from four perspectives. The code would also be shared on the web. (3) To provide a standard comparison, we reviewed up to 10 state-of-the-art HU algorithms, then selected the 5 most benchmark HU algorithms, and compared them on the 15 real hyperspectral datasets. The experiment results are surely reproducible; the implemented codes would be shared on the web.

Key facts. Cited by 33 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 7; 2025: 4; 2026: 10.

33 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Entropic Descent Archetypal Analysis for Blind Hyperspectral Unmixingcited by 11
  2. 2022Graph-based Neural Acceleration for Nonnegative Matrix Factorizationcited by 9
  3. 2021Probabilistic Simplex Component Analysiscited by 8
  4. 2021Using Low-rank Representation of Abundance Maps and Nonnegative Tensor Factorization for Hyperspectral Nonlinear Unmixingcited by 6
  5. 2025MP-HSIR: A Multi-Prompt Framework for Universal Hyperspectral Image Restorationcited by 6
  6. 2021Smoothed Separable Nonnegative Matrix Factorizationcited by 5
  7. 2022Hyperspectral Pixel Unmixing with Latent Dirichlet Variational Autoencodercited by 5
  8. 2024Dual Simplex Volume Maximization for Simplex-Structured Matrix Factorizationcited by 4
  9. 2022Deep Deterministic Independent Component Analysis for Hyperspectral Unmixingcited by 3
  10. 2024Checking the Sufficiently Scattered Condition using a Global Non-Convex Optimization Softwarecited by 3
  11. 2023A Second-Order Majorant Algorithm for Nonnegative Matrix Factorizationcited by 2
  12. 2024Endmember Extraction from Hyperspectral Images Using Self-Dictionary Approach with Linear Programmingcited by 2
21 more
  1. 2021Improving Autoencoder Training Performance for Hyperspectral Unmixing with Network Reinitialisationcited by 1
  2. 2024Block Majorization Minimization with Extrapolation and Application to β-NMFcited by 1
  3. 2026Maximum-Volume Nonnegative Matrix Factorizationcited by 1
  4. 2021SCA-Net: A Self-Correcting Two-Layer Autoencoder for Hyper-spectral Unmixingcited by 0
  5. 2021Dictionary-based Low-Rank Approximations and the Mixed Sparse Coding problemcited by 0
  6. 2023Bidirectional recurrent imputation and abundance estimation of LULC classes with MODIS multispectral time series and geo-topographic and climatic datacited by 0
  7. 2024An Elliptic Kernel Unsupervised Autoencoder-Graph Convolutional Network Ensemble Model for Hyperspectral Unmixingcited by 0
  8. 2024Hyperspectral Unmixing Under Endmember Variability: A Variational Inference Frameworkcited by 0
  9. 2024Low-cost Robust Night-time Aerial Material Segmentation through Hyperspectral Data and Sparse Spatio-Temporal Learningcited by 0
  10. 2025Equal is Not Always Fair: A New Perspective on Hyperspectral Representation Non-Uniformitycited by 0
  11. 2025Diffusion Posterior Sampler for Hyperspectral Unmixing with Spectral Variability Modelingcited by 0
  12. 2025Hyperspectral Image Data Reduction for Endmember Extractioncited by 0
  13. 2026WS-Net: Weak-Signal Representation Learning and Gated Abundance Reconstruction for Hyperspectral Unmixing via State-Space and Weak Signal Attention Fusioncited by 0
  14. 2026Polyhedral Unmixing: Bridging Semantic Segmentation with Hyperspectral Unmixing via Polyhedral-Cone Partitioningcited by 0
  15. 2026Beyond RGB: Benchmarking and Enhancing MLLMs for Hyperspectral Image Understanding via Training-Free Reasoning Frameworkcited by 0
  16. 2026Hyperspectral Unmixing Hierarchiescited by 0
  17. 2026Physics-Guided Regime Unmixingcited by 0
  18. 2026Adaptive Bregman Proximal Stochastic Gradient with a Stabilized Barzilai--Borwein Step Sizecited by 0
  19. 2026Agentic Multimodal Models for Environmental Hyperspectral Unmixingcited by 0
  20. 2026Interpretable Hyperspectral Unmixing Framework with Fixed Endmember Prior and Structured Residual Refinementcited by 0
  21. 2026SimplexUQ: An Evaluation Framework and Benchmark for Conformal Uncertainty on Simplex-Valued Predictionscited by 0