mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Comparison of Decoding Strategies for CTC Acoustic Models

arXiv 1708.04469 ↗First posted 15 Aug 2017cs.CLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Connectionist Temporal Classification has recently attracted a lot of interest as it offers an elegant approach to building acoustic models (AMs) for speech recognition. The CTC loss function maps an input sequence of observable feature vectors to an output sequence of symbols. Output symbols are conditionally independent of each other under CTC loss, so a language model (LM) can be incorporated conveniently during decoding, retaining the traditional separation of acoustic and linguistic components in ASR. For fixed vocabularies, Weighted Finite State Transducers provide a strong baseline for efficient integration of CTC AMs with n-gram LMs. Character-based neural LMs provide a straight forward solution for open vocabulary speech recognition and all-neural models, and can be decoded with beam search. Finally, sequence-to-sequence models can be used to translate a sequence of individual sounds into a word string. We compare the performance of these three approaches, and analyze their error patterns, which provides insightful guidance for future research and development in this important area.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 5; 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort: