Statistics of Deep Generated Images
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Here, we explore the low-level statistics of images generated by state-of-the-art deep generative models. First, Variational auto-encoder (VAE~citekingma2013auto), Wasserstein generative adversarial network (WGAN~citearjovsky2017wasserstein) and deep convolutional generative adversarial network (DCGAN~citeradford2015unsupervised) are trained on the ImageNet dataset and a large set of cartoon frames from animations. Then, for images generated by these models as well as natural scenes and cartoons, statistics including mean power spectrum, the number of connected components in a given image area, distribution of random filter responses, and contrast distribution are computed. Our analyses on training images support current findings on scale invariance, non-Gaussianity, and Weibull contrast distribution of natural scenes. We find that although similar results hold over cartoon images, there is still a significant difference between statistics of natural scenes and images generated by VAE, DCGAN and WGAN models. In particular, generated images do not have scale invariant mean power spectrum magnitude, which indicates existence of extra structures in these images. Inspecting how well the statistics of deep generated images match the known statistical properties of natural images, such as scale invariance, non-Gaussianity, and Weibull contrast distribution, can a) reveal the degree to which deep learning models capture the essence of the natural scenes, b) provide a new dimension to evaluate models, and c) allow possible improvement of image generative models (e.g., via defining new loss functions).
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Pros and Cons of GAN Evaluation Measures: New Developmentscited by 123
- 2023Qualitative Failures of Image Generation Models and Their Application in Detecting Deepfakescited by 31
- 2025Learning Universal Features for Generalizable Image Forgery Localizationcited by 1
- 2021Machines & Influence: An Information Systems Lenscited by 0
- 2025Learning Universal Features for Generalizable Image Forgery Localization10 Apr 2025
- 2023Qualitative Failures of Image Generation Models and Their Application in Detecting Deepfakes29 Mar 2023
- 2021Machines & Influence: An Information Systems Lens26 Nov 2021
- 2021Pros and Cons of GAN Evaluation Measures: New Developments17 Mar 2021