Equivalence of weak and strong modes of measures on topological vector spaces
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A strong mode of a probability measure on a normed space X can be defined as a point u such that the mass of the ball centred at u uniformly dominates the mass of all other balls in the small-radius limit. Helin and Burger weakened this definition by considering only pairwise comparisons with balls whose centres differ by vectors in a dense, proper linear subspace E of X, and posed the question of when these two types of modes coincide. We show that, in a more general setting of metrisable vector spaces equipped with measures that are finite on bounded sets, the density of E and a uniformity condition suffice for the equivalence of these two types of modes. We accomplish this by introducing a new, intermediate type of mode. We also show that these modes can be inequivalent if the uniformity condition fails. Our results shed light on the relationships between among various notions of maximum a posteriori estimator in non-parametric Bayesian inference.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Constructive Disintegration and Conditional Modescited by 0
- 2025Constructive Disintegration and Conditional Modes1 Aug 2025