Independently Controllable Factors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It has been postulated that a good representation is one that disentangles the underlying explanatory factors of variation. However, it remains an open question what kind of training framework could potentially achieve that. Whereas most previous work focuses on the static setting (e.g., with images), we postulate that some of the causal factors could be discovered if the learner is allowed to interact with its environment. The agent can experiment with different actions and observe their effects. More specifically, we hypothesize that some of these factors correspond to aspects of the environment which are independently controllable, i.e., that there exists a policy and a learnable feature for each such aspect of the environment, such that this policy can yield changes in that feature with minimal changes to other features that explain the statistical variations in the observed data. We propose a specific objective function to find such factors and verify experimentally that it can indeed disentangle independently controllable aspects of the environment without any extrinsic reward signal.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2021Disentanglement via Mechanism Sparsity Regularization: A New Principle for Nonlinear ICAcited by 158
- 2021Desiderata for Representation Learning: A Causal Perspectivecited by 76
- 2021Action-Sufficient State Representation Learning for Control with Structural Constraintscited by 31
- 2021Which Mutual-Information Representation Learning Objectives are Sufficient for Control?cited by 28
- 2022Continuous MDP Homomorphisms and Homomorphic Policy Gradientcited by 24
- 2022Homomorphism Autoencoder -- Learning Group Structured Representations from Observed Transitionscited by 18
- 2022Towards a Grounded Theory of Causation for Embodied AIcited by 9
- 2023Policy Gradient Methods in the Presence of Symmetries and State Abstractionscited by 8
- 2023Reinforcement Learning with Exogenous States and Rewardscited by 4
- 2022Disentangled (Un)Controllable Featurescited by 2
- 2024Curricula for Learning Robust Policies with Factored State Representations in Changing Environmentscited by 0
- 2026Dueling World Models: Advantage-Style Action Channels for Common-Mode Distractor Rejectioncited by 0
- 2026Dueling World Models: Advantage-Style Action Channels for Common-Mode Distractor Rejection7 Aug 2026
- 2024Curricula for Learning Robust Policies with Factored State Representations in Changing Environments13 Sep 2024
- 2023Policy Gradient Methods in the Presence of Symmetries and State Abstractions9 May 2023
- 2023Reinforcement Learning with Exogenous States and Rewards22 Mar 2023
- 2022Disentangled (Un)Controllable Features31 Oct 2022
- 2022Continuous MDP Homomorphisms and Homomorphic Policy Gradient15 Sep 2022
- 2022Homomorphism Autoencoder -- Learning Group Structured Representations from Observed Transitions25 Jul 2022
- 2022Towards a Grounded Theory of Causation for Embodied AI28 Jun 2022
- 2021Action-Sufficient State Representation Learning for Control with Structural Constraints12 Oct 2021
- 2021Desiderata for Representation Learning: A Causal Perspective8 Sep 2021
- 2021Disentanglement via Mechanism Sparsity Regularization: A New Principle for Nonlinear ICA21 Jul 2021
- 2021Which Mutual-Information Representation Learning Objectives are Sufficient for Control?14 Jun 2021