mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MLBench: How Good Are Machine Learning Clouds for Binary Classification Tasks on Structured Data?

arXiv 1707.09562 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2017cs.DC cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We conduct an empirical study of machine learning functionalities provided by major cloud service providers, which we call machine learning clouds. Machine learning clouds hold the promise of hiding all the sophistication of running large-scale machine learning: Instead of specifying how to run a machine learning task, users only specify what machine learning task to run and the cloud figures out the rest. Raising the level of abstraction, however, rarely comes free - a performance penalty is possible. How good, then, are current machine learning clouds on real-world machine learning workloads? We study this question with a focus on binary classication problems. We present mlbench, a novel benchmark constructed by harvesting datasets from Kaggle competitions. We then compare the performance of the top winning code available from Kaggle with that of running machine learning clouds from both Azure and Amazon on mlbench. Our comparative study reveals the strength and weakness of existing machine learning clouds and points out potential future directions for improvement.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.

1 paper.