mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

In-Order Transition-based Constituent Parsing

arXiv 1707.05000 ↗First posted 17 Jul 2017cs.CLcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Both bottom-up and top-down strategies have been used for neural transition-based constituent parsing. The parsing strategies differ in terms of the order in which they recognize productions in the derivation tree, where bottom-up strategies and top-down strategies take post-order and pre-order traversal over trees, respectively. Bottom-up parsers benefit from rich features from readily built partial parses, but lack lookahead guidance in the parsing process; top-down parsers benefit from non-local guidance for local decisions, but rely on a strong encoder over the input to predict a constituent hierarchy before its construction.To mitigate both issues, we propose a novel parsing system based on in-order traversal over syntactic trees, designing a set of transition actions to find a compromise between bottom-up constituent information and top-down lookahead information. Based on stack-LSTM, our psycholinguistically motivated constituent parsing system achieves 91.8 F1 on WSJ benchmark. Furthermore, the system achieves 93.6 F1 with supervised reranking and 94.2 F1 with semi-supervised reranking, which are the best results on the WSJ benchmark.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 5; 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 5.

23 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Bottom-Up Constituency Parsing and Nested Named Entity Recognition with Pointer Networkscited by 21
  2. 2022BenchCLAMP: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models on Syntactic and Semantic Parsingcited by 13
  3. 2021Investigating Non-local Features for Neural Constituency Parsingcited by 4
  4. 2021Discontinuous Grammar as a Foreign Languagecited by 4
  5. 2023Hermes: Unlocking Security Analysis of Cellular Network Protocols by Synthesizing Finite State Machines from Natural Language Specificationscited by 4
  6. 2023LLM-enhanced Self-training for Cross-domain Constituency Parsingcited by 4
  7. 2021Generating CCG Categoriescited by 2
  8. 2021Head-driven Phrase Structure Parsing in O(n3) Time Complexitycited by 2
  9. 2022Scene Graph Modification as Incremental Structure Expandingcited by 2
  10. 2023Constituency Parsing using LLMscited by 2
  11. 2021In-Order Chart-Based Constituent Parsingcited by 1
  12. 2021Neural Combinatory Constituency Parsingcited by 1
11 more
  1. 2023Unleashing the True Potential of Sequence-to-Sequence Models for Sequence Tagging and Structure Parsingcited by 1
  2. 2022Shift-Reduce Task-Oriented Semantic Parsing with Stack-Transformerscited by 0
  3. 2022Joint Chinese Word Segmentation and Span-based Constituency Parsingcited by 0
  4. 2022On Parsing as Taggingcited by 0
  5. 2025Contrastive Learning on LLM Back Generation Treebank for Cross-domain Constituency Parsingcited by 0
  6. 2025Punctuation-aware treebank tree binarizationcited by 0
  7. 2026A tree interpretation of arc standard dependency derivationcited by 0
  8. 2026Exploiting Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Transformers for Sequence-to-Sequence Constituent Parsingcited by 0
  9. 2026Does Traversal Order Matter? A Systematic Study of Tree Traversal Methods in Transformer Grammarscited by 0
  10. 2026Non-binary bottom-up constituency parsing without arity actionscited by 0
  11. 2026Representing and Parsing Korean Constituency Structure at Different Levels of Granularitycited by 0