Sustainable computational science: the ReScience initiative
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Computer science offers a large set of tools for prototyping, writing, running, testing, validating, sharing and reproducing results, however computational science lags behind. In the best case, authors may provide their source code as a compressed archive and they may feel confident their research is reproducible. But this is not exactly true. James Buckheit and David Donoho proposed more than two decades ago that an article about computational results is advertising, not scholarship. The actual scholarship is the full software environment, code, and data that produced the result. This implies new workflows, in particular in peer-reviews. Existing journals have been slow to adapt: source codes are rarely requested, hardly ever actually executed to check that they produce the results advertised in the article. ReScience is a peer-reviewed journal that targets computational research and encourages the explicit replication of already published research, promoting new and open-source implementations in order to ensure that the original research can be replicated from its description. To achieve this goal, the whole publishing chain is radically different from other traditional scientific journals. ReScience resides on GitHub where each new implementation of a computational study is made available together with comments, explanations, and software tests.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2021A Systematic Review of Reproducibility Research in Natural Language Processingcited by 34
- 2024Reproducibility in Machine Learning-based Research: Overview, Barriers and Driverscited by 34
- 2023Reproducibility in Machine Learning-Driven Researchcited by 15
- 2025From Reproduction to Replication: Evaluating Research Agents with Progressive Code Maskingcited by 12
- 2026SciCoQA: Quality Assurance for Scientific Paper--Code Alignmentcited by 9
- 2022Quantified Reproducibility Assessment of NLP Resultscited by 8
- 2023NLP Reproducibility For All: Understanding Experiences of Beginnerscited by 4
- 2021Quantifying Reproducibility in NLP and MLcited by 1
- 2026LLM-Assisted Replication for Quantitative Social Sciencecited by 1
- 2025Make Literature-Based Discovery Great Again through Reproducible Pipelinescited by 0
- 2026LLM-Assisted Replication for Quantitative Social Science4 Feb 2026
- 2026SciCoQA: Quality Assurance for Scientific Paper--Code Alignment19 Jan 2026
- 2025From Reproduction to Replication: Evaluating Research Agents with Progressive Code Masking24 Jun 2025
- 2025Make Literature-Based Discovery Great Again through Reproducible Pipelines23 Feb 2025
- 2024Reproducibility in Machine Learning-based Research: Overview, Barriers and Drivers20 Jun 2024
- 2023Reproducibility in Machine Learning-Driven Research19 Jul 2023
- 2023NLP Reproducibility For All: Understanding Experiences of Beginners26 May 2023
- 2022Quantified Reproducibility Assessment of NLP Results12 Apr 2022
- 2021Quantifying Reproducibility in NLP and ML2 Sep 2021
- 2021A Systematic Review of Reproducibility Research in Natural Language Processing14 Mar 2021