Best-Effort Inductive Logic Programming via Fine-grained Cost-based Hypothesis Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We describe the Inspire system which participated in the first competition on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP). Inspire is based on Answer Set Programming (ASP). The distinguishing feature of Inspire is an ASP encoding for hypothesis space generation: given a set of facts representing the mode bias, and a set of cost configuration parameters, each answer set of this encoding represents a single rule that is considered for finding a hypothesis that entails the given examples. Compared with state-of-the-art methods that use the length of the rule body as a metric for rule complexity, our approach permits a much more fine-grained specification of the shape of hypothesis candidate rules. The Inspire system iteratively increases the rule cost limit and thereby increases the search space until it finds a suitable hypothesis. The system searches for a hypothesis that entails a single example at a time, utilizing an ASP encoding derived from the encoding used in XHAIL. We perform experiments with the development and test set of the ILP competition. For comparison we also adapted the ILASP system to process competition instances. Experimental results show that the cost parameters for the hypothesis search space are an important factor for finding hypotheses to competition instances within tight resource bounds.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 4.
11 papers.
- 2021Inductive logic programming at 30cited by 46
- 2021Predicate Invention by Learning From Failurescited by 9
- 2022Learning logic programs by combining programscited by 7
- 2023Principled and Efficient Motif Finding for Structure Learning of Lifted Graphical Modelscited by 4
- 2022Relational program synthesis with numerical reasoningcited by 2
- 2025Inductive Learning of Robot Task Knowledge from Raw Data and Online Expert Feedbackcited by 2
- 2024Efficiently Learning Probabilistic Logical Models by Cheaply Ranking Mined Rulescited by 1
- 2021Learning logic programs by explaining their failurescited by 0
- 2025Efficient rule induction by ignoring pointless rulescited by 0
- 2025MPRM: A Markov Path-based Rule Miner for Efficient and Interpretable Knowledge Graph Reasoningcited by 0
- 2025Honey, I shrunk the hypothesis space (through logical preprocessing)cited by 0
- 2025Honey, I shrunk the hypothesis space (through logical preprocessing)7 Jun 2025
- 2025MPRM: A Markov Path-based Rule Miner for Efficient and Interpretable Knowledge Graph Reasoning18 May 2025
- 2025Efficient rule induction by ignoring pointless rules3 Feb 2025
- 2025Inductive Learning of Robot Task Knowledge from Raw Data and Online Expert Feedback13 Jan 2025
- 2024Efficiently Learning Probabilistic Logical Models by Cheaply Ranking Mined Rules24 Sep 2024
- 2023Principled and Efficient Motif Finding for Structure Learning of Lifted Graphical Models9 Feb 2023
- 2022Relational program synthesis with numerical reasoning3 Oct 2022
- 2022Learning logic programs by combining programs1 Jun 2022
- 2021Predicate Invention by Learning From Failures29 Apr 2021
- 2021Inductive logic programming at 3021 Feb 2021
- 2021Learning logic programs by explaining their failures18 Feb 2021