mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Computational aspects of robust optimized certainty equivalents and option pricing

arXiv 1706.10186 ↗First posted 30 Jun 2017q-fin.RM math.OCcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accounting for model uncertainty in risk management and option pricing leads to infinite dimensional optimization problems which are both analytically and numerically intractable. In this article we study when this hurdle can be overcome for the so-called optimized certainty equivalent risk measure (OCE) -- including the average value-at-risk as a special case. First we focus on the case where the uncertainty is modeled by a nonlinear expectation penalizing distributions that are "far" in terms of optimal-transport distance (Wasserstein distance for instance) from a given baseline distribution. It turns out that the computation of the robust OCE reduces to a finite dimensional problem, which in some cases can even be solved explicitly. This principle also applies to the shortfall risk measure as well as for the pricing of European options. Further, we derive convex dual representations of the robust OCE for measurable claims without any assumptions on the set of distributions. Finally, we give conditions on the latter set under which the robust average value-at-risk is a tail risk measure.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

7 papers.