A giant with feet of clay: on the validity of the data that feed machine learning in medicine
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper considers the use of Machine Learning (ML) in medicine by focusing on the main problem that this computational approach has been aimed at solving or at least minimizing: uncertainty. To this aim, we point out how uncertainty is so ingrained in medicine that it biases also the representation of clinical phenomena, that is the very input of ML models, thus undermining the clinical significance of their output. Recognizing this can motivate both medical doctors, in taking more responsibility in the development and use of these decision aids, and the researchers, in pursuing different ways to assess the value of these systems. In so doing, both designers and users could take this intrinsic characteristic of medicine more seriously and consider alternative approaches that do not "sweep uncertainty under the rug" within an objectivist fiction, which everyone can come up by believing as true.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Challenges for machine learning in clinical translation of big data imaging studiescited by 15
- 2024MedUHIP: Towards Human-In-the-Loop Medical Segmentationcited by 5
- 2022Responsible AI in Healthcarecited by 1
- 2025Synthetic Data and the Shifting Ground of Truthcited by 0
- 2025Synthetic Data and the Shifting Ground of Truth14 Sep 2025
- 2024MedUHIP: Towards Human-In-the-Loop Medical Segmentation3 Aug 2024
- 2022Responsible AI in Healthcare19 Feb 2022
- 2021Challenges for machine learning in clinical translation of big data imaging studies7 Jul 2021